Recruiting & Search Model
Decision Matrices
Hiring models are often evaluated on vague marketing claims. These decision matrices provide direct financial calculations, time-to-fill metrics, candidate data ownership rules, and replacement guarantees to guide institutional hiring strategy.
Active Model Comparisons
RPO vs. Contingency Recruiting (2027/2028)
Evaluates cost-of-vacancy drag, 42% cost savings on multi-hire plans, candidate data rights, and 4-stage pre-ATS screening protocols.
Retained Search vs. Engaged Search (2027)
Compares traditional 33% retained search firms against engaged sprint architecture. Evaluates upfront cash lockup, milestone risk, and shortlist velocity.
Model Your Exact Cost-of-Vacancy
Run a diagnostic sprint with our senior search architects to calculate your specific vacancy drag and evaluate candidate market availability.
100% of the $3,500 pilot fee is credited toward any retained search agreement initiated within 30 days.